Sunday, January 24, 2016


Only seven NFP-only physicians - of any specialty - have been identified in the Philadelphia area:

While Dr Isajiw is the lone NFP-only physician found in the directory of the Mercy Health System of Southeast Pa and no NFP-only physician can be found in the directory of St. Mary Medical Center, they advertise that they provide "Women's Health Services" (See 1 and 2.).  Among its Women's Health Services, St. Mary's includes three specialists in Maternal Fetal Medicine (aka, Perinatologists; i.e., Richard A. Latta, MDMarc F., Rosenn, MD, Stephen J., Smith, MD), each of whom is also an "Abington Perinatal Associate" (See 1, 2, and 3.).  Isn't it of concern that there is another Abington Perinatal Associate, who has been reported to be involved with fetal "reduction" (See 12, and 3.)?

While Dr Ruberu is the lone NFP-only physician found in the directory of Holy Redeemer, it includes 6 physicans (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) who are from Reproductive Medicine Associates of Philadelphia or  Abington Reproductive Medicine, which offer a smorgasbord of morally excluded services, such as egg/embryo/sperm "donation," IVF, and "surrogacy." 

Finally, neither Saint Mary's Advanced Directives and Living Wills, nor Holy Redeemer's Making Your Own Health Care Decisions appear to properly specify Catholic teaching with regard to nutrition and hydration, and that health care services cannot honor advance directives (e.g., non-specific directives to forego nutrition and hydration) opposed to Catholic teaching.

As per Pope Emeritus Benedict XI,
  • "The diocesan Bishop is obliged, if necessary, to make known to the faithful the fact that the activity of a particular charitable agency is no longer being carried out in conformity with the Church’s teaching, and then to prohibit that agency from using the name 'Catholic' and to take the necessary measures should personal responsibilities emerge."  

I once again respectfully request that you remove permission for the Mercy Health System of SE Pa, St. Mary Medical Center, and Holy Redeemer to identify themselves as "Catholic."
Dear Pastors,



1/23/16 update
You advertise Grandview Medical Practices <www.gvmp.org>, which includes OB-GYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine.  How have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics?
Your bulletin advertises Shop Rite of Yardley, which in turn even advertises the Plan B abortifacient <http://www.shoprite.com/pd/Plan-B/OneStep-Emergency-Contraceptive/1-ct/351285162885/4E53123746/>.

Since you advertise Village Shires Pharmacy <http://www.villageshirespharmacy.com>, how have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?
Since you advertise Riccio Family Pharmacy <http://www.ricciofamilypharmacy.com/>, how have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?


Since you advertise Riccio Family Pharmacy <http://www.ricciofamilypharmacy.com/>, how have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?
It MAY be the case that Oxford Valley Pharmacy <http://www.oxfordvalleypharmacy.com/> does NOT sell abortifacients/contraceptives.  Since you advertise them, how have you vetted that they indeed practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?


You advertise Grandview Medical Practices <www.gvmp.org>, which includes OB-GYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine.  How have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics?


Your bulletin advertises Shop Rite of Yardley, which in turn even advertises the Plan B abortifacient <http://www.shoprite.com/pd/Plan-B/OneStep-Emergency-Contraceptive/1-ct/351285162885/4E53123746/>.




Your bulletin advertises Shop Rite of Yardley, which in turn even advertises the Plan B abortifacient <http://www.shoprite.com/pd/Plan-B/OneStep-Emergency-Contraceptive/1-ct/351285162885/4E53123746/>.






You advertise Grandview Medical Practices <www.gvmp.org>, which includes OB-GYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine.  How have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics?
You advertise Grandview Medical Practices <www.gvmp.org>, which includes OB-GYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine.  How have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics?
It MAY be the case that Oxford Valley Pharmacy <http://www.oxfordvalleypharmacy.com/> does NOT sell abortifacients/contraceptives.  Since you advertise them, how have you vetted that they indeed practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?

Since you advertise Mat’s Pharmancy & Medical Supply <http://www.matspharmacypa.com >, how have you vetted that they practice in manners consistent with Catholic medical ethics and do not sell abortifacients/contraceptives?

 

remote material cooperation?

https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaticanresponse.pdfhttps://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaticanresponse.pdfhttps://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaticanresponse.pdfhttps://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaticanresponse.pdf
The Pontifical Academy for Life goes on to remind us that "cooperation" does not only involve "what I have done" but it also involves "what I have failed to do":
https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/vaticanresponse.pdf

It should also be noted that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services voices concern about scandal:
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/health-care/upload/Ethical-Religious-Directives-Catholic-Health-Care-Services-fifth-edition-2009.pdf

 

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Annual Addresses of the Holy Fathers to the Roma Rota (the Church's "Supreme Court", if you will)


In Saint Pope John Paul II's quarter century of addresses to the Roman Rota (1979 - 2005), he seemed to evidence growing and grave concern about possible misuse of marriage tribunals, even focusing on a misguided "pastoral" perspective that would destabilize marriage and family.  It would appear that his concerns led to Dignitas Connubii (1/25/2005). 

In Pope Benedict XVI's addresses to the Roman Rota (2006-2013), he warned that “the conviction that the pastoral good of the person in an irregular marital situation requires a sort of canonical regularization, independently of the validity or nullity of his/her marriage...has also spread in certain ecclesiastical milieus" (1/27/07).  

In Pope Francis' first address to the Roman Roman Rota, he continued in the line of his predecessors.  In his second address (1/23/15), he spoke of 
"the many, many families that, supported and nourished by  sincere faith, realize in the effort and joy of the everyday the goods of marriage, assumed with sincerity at the moment of the wedding and pursued with fidelity and tenacity. However, the Church also knows the suffering of many family nuclei that disintegrate, leaving behind them the ruins of affective relations, plans, and common expectations....today there is a great number of faithful in irregular situations, whose histories have been strongly influenced by the widespread worldly mentality"
Yesterday, 1/22/16, marked Pope Francis' third address to the Roman Rota:
"Dear Brothers,

"I give you my cordial welcome and thank the Dean for the words with which he introduced our meeting.

"The ministry of the Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota has always been to help the Successor of Peter, so that the Church, inseparably connected with the family, will continue to proclaim the plan of God the Creator and Redeemer on the sacredness and beauty of the family institute — a mission that is always timely, but which acquires particular importance in our time.

"In addition to the definition of the Roman Rota as Tribunal of the family,[1] I would like to highlight another prerogative, namely, that it is the Tribunal of the truth of the sacred bond. And these two aspects are complementary.

"The Church, in fact, can show the indefectible merciful love of God to families, in particular those wounded by sin and by the trials of life and, at the same time, proclaim the inalienable truth of marriage according to God’s plan. This service is entrusted primarily to the Pope and to the Bishops.

"In the Synodal sessions on the subject of the family, which the Lord granted us to carry out in the last two years, we were able to acquire, in a spirit and style of effective collegiality, a profound and wise discernment, thanks to which the Church has — among other things — indicated to the world that there cannot be confusion between the family willed by God and all other types of union.

"With this same spiritual and pastoral attitude, your activity — be it in judging be it in contributing to permanent formation –, assists and promotes the opus veritatis. When the Church, through your service, decides to declare the truth about marriage in a concrete case, for the good of the faithful, she has present at the same time those who by free choice and unhappy circumstances of life,[2] live in an objective state of error, continue to be the object of the merciful love of Christ and therefore of the Church herself.

"The family, founded on indissoluble, unitive and procreative marriage, belongs to God’s 'dream' and that of His Church for the salvation of humanity.[3]

"As Blessed Paul VI affirmed, the Church has always addressed 'a particular look, full of solicitude and love, to the family and its problems. Through the means of marriage and the family, God has wisely united two of the greatest human realities: the mission to transmit life and the mutual and legitimate love of man and woman, by which they are called to complete one another in a mutual donation which is not only physical but above all spiritual. Or to say it better: God willed to render spouses participants of His love: of the personal love that He has for each one of them and by which He calls them to help one another and to give themselves to each other to reach the fullness of their personal life; and of the love that He brings to humanity and to all His children, by which He desires to multiply the children of men to render them participants of His Life and His eternal felicity.'[4]

"The family and the Church, concur on different planes, to support the human being to the end of his existence. And they do so, certainly, with the teachings they transmit, but also with their nature itself as community of love and life. In fact, if one can well say that the family is the 'domestic Church,' applied to the Church rightly is the title 'family of God.' Therefore, 'the family spirit' is a constitutional charter for the Church: Christianity must appear so and be so. It is written in clear letters: 'you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God' (Ephesians 2:19). 'The Church is and must be the family of God.'[5]

"It is precisely because she is Mother and Teacher that the Church knows that, among Christians, some have a strong faith, formed by charity and reinforced by good catechesis and nourished by prayer and the sacramental life, while others have a weak faith, neglected, not formed, little educated or forgotten.

"It is good to state clearly that the quality of the faith is not an essential condition for marital consensus, which, according to the everlasting doctrine, can be undermined only at the natural level (Cf. CIC, can. 1055, paragraphs 1 and 2). In fact, the habitus fidei is infused at the moment of Baptism and continues to have a mysterious influence on the soul, even when the faith has not been developed and, psychologically, seems to be absent. It is not rare that the parties contracting marriage, driven to true marriage by the instinctus naturae, have, at the moment of the celebration, a limited awareness of the fullness of God’s plan, and only later, in family life, they discover all that God the Creator and Redeemer has established for them. The lack of formation in the faith and also the error about unity, indissolubility and the sacramental dignity of marriage vitiate the marital consensus only if they determine the will (Cf. CIC, can 1099). Precisely because of this, errors that regard the sacredness of marriage must be assessed very carefully. Therefore, with a renewed sense of responsibility, the Church continues to propose marriage in its essential elements – offspring, the good of the spouses, unity, indissolubility, sacredness[6] –, not as an ideal for a few, despite modern models centered on the ephemeral and the transitory, but as a reality that, with the grace of Christ, can be lived by all the baptized faithful. And therefore, there is greater reason for the pastoral urgency, which involves all the structures of the Church, drives to converge towards a common attempt ordered to appropriate preparation for marriage, in a sort of new catechumenate — I stress this: in a sort of new catechumenate — so desired by some Synodal Fathers.[7]

"Dear Brothers, the time we are living is very demanding, be it for the families, be it for us Pastors who are called to support them. With this awareness, I wish you good work for the New Year that the Lord gives us. I assure you of my prayer and I also count on yours. May Our Lady and Saint Joseph obtain for the Church to grow in the spirit of the family and to families to feel increasingly a living and active part of the People of God. Thank you."

The Beatitudes from "Jesus of Nazareth"

 

Use of Emergency So-Called Contraceptives in Catholic Hospitals for Those Reporting Rape

Book & Film Reviews, pt 1

Book & Film Reviews, pt 2

Blog Archive

About Me

I am an enormously blessed husband and dad. In regard to my Catholic theological background, I have a certificate in social ministry & a master's degree (moral theology concentration), as well as a catechetical diploma from the Vatican's Sacred Congregation for the Clergy (Nope, I am not now - nor have I have ever been - a seminarian, deacon, or priest.). I feel particularly proud to have a mandatum. I also have a doctorate in Christian counseling psychology.

And yup, that's me!

And yup, that's me!
(from page 1 of the NY Sun, 3/22/04)

Total Pageviews

12/12/08 Interview with Rev. Tad Pacholczyk, Ph.D. of the National Catholic Bioethics Center

March for Life 2010

CatholicsComeHome.org