In its introduction, the Charter reminds us that the vocation of health care is to be greatly honored. All that the it proclaims about procreation rests on the truth that “11….The inseparable bond between conjugal love and human generation, imprinted on the nature of the human person, is a law by which everyone must be guided and to which everyone is held.” While the Church clearly prohibits so-called embryo "transfers" from one woman to another, some have suggested - even after the Vatican's Dignitas Personae of 2008 - that a door might be yet be ajar for consideration of exceptions for so-called "snowflake adoptions." I find nothing in the Charter to support this.
The
section on "Living" is the largest in the Charter and covers a vast
array of areas, including potentially abortifacient "interceptives" and
"contraceptives."
Like Dignitas Personae before it, the Charter offers NO guidelines for any supposed "moral" use of interceptives or contragestatives, indicating the need for change in practices at Catholic hospitals. From a medical standpoint, Doctors (Rev.) Juan Vélez, Rebecca Peck, Chris Kahlenborn, Walter B. Severs, Walter Rella, Julio Tudelo, Justo Aznar and Bruno Moznegga, as well as the Catholic Medical Association, have been warning us that there is NO way to use interceptives or contraceptives without the very real risk of causing abortion.
Like Dignitas Personae before it, the Charter offers NO guidelines for any supposed "moral" use of interceptives or contragestatives, indicating the need for change in practices at Catholic hospitals. From a medical standpoint, Doctors (Rev.) Juan Vélez, Rebecca Peck, Chris Kahlenborn, Walter B. Severs, Walter Rella, Julio Tudelo, Justo Aznar and Bruno Moznegga, as well as the Catholic Medical Association, have been warning us that there is NO way to use interceptives or contraceptives without the very real risk of causing abortion.
While
footnote #167 might seem to infer a favorable judgment on the use of
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Section 30 of Dignitas Personae appears
to preclude their use. Dr. Diane Irving tells us that "'Some iPS cell
are potentially
embryos'....Given the ability of cells to be reverted to the embryonic
stage, she said, 'any human cell can be used for reproductive purposes,'
so pro-life people must start making very careful distinctions about
what type of cell is being created and used and the methods used to
obtain them" (LifeSiteNews, 4/23/13).
The
Church has NOT issued a definitive judgement on brain death criteria.
Dr. Peter Colosi (Our Sunday Visitor Newsweekly, 8/8/12) notes that "The
medical studies of Dr. Alan
Shewmon of UCLA Medical School are quite convincing indications that
brain dead people are not dead, or at the very least that we do not have
moral certainty that they are." The updated Charter
includes this 2008 cautious quote from Pope Benedict XVI: “In an area
such as this, in fact, there cannot be the slightest suspicion of
arbitration and where certainty has not been attained the principle of
precaution must prevail. This is why it is useful to promote research
and interdisciplinary reflection to place public opinion before the most
transparent truth on the anthropological, social, ethical and juridical
implications of the practice of transplantation."